Hybrid funds are one of the most popular categories in India because they strike a balance between growth, stability, and tax efficiency. Within this category, two segments often confuse investors:
While both invest in a mix of equity and debt, their structure, risk behaviour, taxation, and suitability differ significantly. This guide breaks everything down in a simple, timeless, and investment-focused manner.
Balanced Funds are now categorised as Aggressive Hybrid Funds under SEBI rules.
Key defining rule:
They must maintain:
The minimum 65% equity allocation ensures they are taxed like equity Mutual Funds.
Because the term balanced traditionally implies equal allocation — which is not the case. SEBI renamed them to Aggressive Hybrid to reflect their high equity exposure.
Since equity exposure is above 65%:
Talk to our investment specialist
Balanced Advantage Funds are classified as Dynamic Asset Allocation Funds.
They are hybrid funds that can change their equity-debt mix dynamically based on market conditions.
Key difference:
Unlike Aggressive Hybrid Funds, these funds:
Yet they maintain effective equity taxation by using equity derivatives.
Typically using:
PE ratio models → These models adjust equity–debt allocation based on how expensive or cheap the market is, using the price-to-earnings ratio as the signal.
PB ratio models → These models shift allocation by tracking the price-to-book value, indicating whether markets are trading above or below their intrinsic worth.
Momentum indicators → These use market trends and recent price movements to decide whether to increase or reduce equity exposure.
In-House dynamic asset allocation frameworks → These are proprietary models built by fund houses that blend valuation, volatility, macro data, and market trends to automatically rebalance portfolios.
This makes their overall journey smoother and less volatile compared to Aggressive Hybrid Funds.

Through derivatives, these funds maintain equity taxation, similar to aggressive hybrid funds.
| Feature | Balanced Funds (Aggressive Hybrid) | Balanced Advantage Funds (Dynamic Asset Allocation) |
|---|---|---|
| Equity Allocation | Fixed 65%–80% | Dynamic (can vary widely, usually 30%–80%) |
| Risk Level | Higher (equity-heavy) | Moderate (smoother ride) |
| Market Behaviour | Outperforms in bull markets | Outperforms in volatile/recovering markets |
| Flexibility | Low | Very high |
| Taxation | Equity taxation | Equity taxation maintained via derivatives |
| Investor Type | Aggressive, long-term | Moderate risk, stability seekers |
| Volatility | High | Lower |
Because during euphoric markets, valuation models may:
This creates temporary underperformance compared to aggressive hybrids.
But…
📌 In volatile or falling markets, BAFs usually outperform
Because they reduce equity before the fall — resulting in lighter drawdowns and quicker recoveries.
To keep the article timeless, instead of giving year-specific numbers, here is how hybrid fund trends continue in India:
Industry data from AMFI shows that hybrid funds consistently manage hundreds of thousands of crores in AUM, forming a large and growing segment due to their balanced risk-return profile.
BAFs often account for the largest share of hybrid funds because:
This trend remains consistent across years.
During periods of market volatility (global uncertainties, elections, rate changes), BAFs attract strong inflows due to their ability to rebalance automatically.
Hybrid fund SIP folios have grown steadily over the years, indicating rising long-term retail participation.
Across multiple market cycles:
These timeless patterns make this comparison useful regardless of the year.
Choose Balanced Funds / Aggressive Hybrid Funds if:
Choose Balanced Advantage Funds if:
Both Balanced Funds and Balanced Advantage Funds fall under the hybrid category, but they serve different purposes.
Balanced (Aggressive Hybrid) Funds are ideal for investors comfortable with high equity exposure and looking for long-term wealth creation.
Balanced Advantage Funds are better for those who want a smoother experience, dynamic rebalancing, and reduced volatility while still enjoying equity taxation.
There is no “best” category — only the best fit for your risk profile, investment horizon, and market comfort level.
A: Yes, both maintain equity taxation, although BAFs achieve this through a mix of direct equity and derivatives.
A: BAFs are generally less volatile because they adjust equity exposure dynamically.
A: Aggressive Hybrid Funds usually outperform due to high fixed equity allocation.
A: Yes — BAFs are widely recommended for new investors because of smoother risk.
A: Aggressive Hybrid: 5+ years and Balanced Advantage: 3–5+ years
You Might Also Like

ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage Fund Vs HDFC Balanced Advantage Fund



HDFC Balanced Advantage Fund Vs ICICI Prudential Equity And Debt Fund

ICICI Prudential Equity And Debt Fund Vs HDFC Balanced Advantage Fund

ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage Fund Vs HDFC Hybrid Equity Fund

SBI Equity Hybrid Fund Vs ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage Fund

ICICI Prudential Equity And Debt Fund Vs ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage Fund