SBI Magnum mid cap fund and HDFC Mid-cap Opportunities Fund both belong to the mid-cap category of Equity Funds. Though both the schemes invest their corpus in shares mid-cap companies, nevertheless; both the schemes differ on account of various parameters. In simple terms, the Market capitalization of mid-cap companies ranges between INR 500 – INR 10,000 Crores. These companies in many instances have outperformed the performance of large-cap companies. These funds form the middle of the pyramid when equity funds are classified on the Basis of market capitalization. These companies are considered to be adaptable to changes and have the potential to form part of large-cap companies. So, let us understand the differences between SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund and HDFC Mid-cap Opportunities Fund through this article.
SBI Magnum Midcap Fund is managed and offered by SBI Mutual Fund under the mid-cap category of equity funds. This scheme was launched in the year 2005 and its uses Nifty MidSmallcap 400 Index as its base to build its Portfolio. This scheme is suitable for individuals looking for Capital growth and whose investment tenure is long. The investment objective of this scheme is to attain capital appreciation by Investing in a diversified portfolio comprising of equity stocks of midcap companies. Based on the Asset Allocation of the scheme, SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund can invest around 65-100% of its fund money in shares of mid-cap companies. This scheme is solely managed by Ms. Sohini Andani. As on March 31, 2018, some of the top constituents of portfolio consisted of Cholamandalam Finance and Investment Company Limited, Dixon Technologies (India) Limited, Godrej Properties Limited, and Carborundum Universal Limited.
This scheme is a part of HDFC Mutual Fund and was launched on June 25, 2007. The objective of this scheme is to attain capital appreciation that is generated from a portfolio that primarily consists of equity and equity-related instruments of mid and small cap companies. The Fund managers managing the HDFC Mid-cap Opportunities Fund are Mr. Rakesh Vyas and Mr. Chirag Setalvad. This scheme uses two indexes as the base to construct its portfolio. The primary index is NIFTY Midcap 100 Index while the additional one is NIFTY 50 Index. As on March 31, 2018, some of the constituents of HDFC Mid-cap opportunities Fund included MRF Limited, Apollo Tyres Limited, Exide Industries Limited, and City Union Bank Limited.
Though both the schemes belong to the same category of equity funds yet; there are differences between them. So, let understand the differences between these schemes with the help of four sections that are as follows.
Current NAV, scheme category, Fincash Rating, and others are some of the components that form part of the basics section. With respect to Fincash Rating, it can be said that both the schemes are rated as 3-Star schemes. The NAV comparison also shows that there is a difference between the NAV of both the schemes. The NAV of SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund was approximately INR 83 while of HDFC Mid-cap Opportunities Fund was around INR 59 as of April 24, 2018. Even the comparison of scheme category reveals that both schemes are a part of the same category, that is, Equity Mid & Small-cap. The comparison of basics section is summarized in the table given below.
Parameters Basics NAV Net Assets (Cr) Launch Date Rating Category Sub Cat. Category Rank Risk Expense Ratio Sharpe Ratio Information Ratio Alpha Ratio Benchmark Exit Load SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹223.285 ↓ -2.33 (-1.03 %) ₹23,269 on 30 Jun 25 29 Mar 05 ☆☆☆ Equity Mid Cap 28 Moderately High 1.77 -0.15 -1.33 -3.33 Not Available 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL) HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹189.412 ↓ -1.40 (-0.73 %) ₹84,061 on 30 Jun 25 25 Jun 07 ☆☆☆ Equity Mid Cap 24 Moderately High 1.51 0.23 0.62 3 Not Available 0-1 Years (1%),1 Years and above(NIL)
It is the second section in the comparison of the schemes. Here, the differences in the Compounded Annual Growth Rate or CAGR returns for different time intervals are compared. The comparison of performance section shows that in many instances, HDFC Mid-cap Opportunities Fund has performed better. The table given below shows the summary of comparison section.
Parameters Performance 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 1 Year 3 Year 5 Year Since launch SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details -7.1% 0.2% -1.3% -3.3% 15.5% 25.7% 16.5% HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details -4.1% 7.4% 5.8% 3.1% 25.9% 29.8% 17.6%
Talk to our investment specialist
This section compares the absolute returns of both the schemes for a particular year. The comparison of yearly performance section also reveals that in many instances, HDFC Mid-cap Opportunities Fund leads the race. The summary comparison of yearly performance section is tabulated as follows.
Parameters Yearly Performance 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details 20.3% 34.5% 3% 52.2% 30.4% HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details 28.6% 44.5% 12.3% 39.9% 21.7%
This being the last section, compares elements such as AUM, minimum SIP and lumpsum investment. The begin with the AUM, we can find a drastic difference between the AUM of the schemes. As on March 31, 2018, the AUM of SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund is approximately INR 3,799 Crores while of HDFC Mid-cap Opportunities Fund is around INR 19,339 Crores. The minimum SIP and lumpsum amount for both the schemes is same. The minimum SIP amount for both the same is INR 500 while the lumpsum amount is INR 5,000. The table given below summarizes the comparison of other details section.
Parameters Other Details Min SIP Investment Min Investment Fund Manager SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹500 ₹5,000 Bhavin Vithlani - 1.33 Yr. HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details ₹300 ₹5,000 Chirag Setalvad - 18.11 Yr.
SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Jul 20 ₹10,000 31 Jul 21 ₹18,155 31 Jul 22 ₹20,460 31 Jul 23 ₹25,044 31 Jul 24 ₹34,707 31 Jul 25 ₹33,427 HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details Growth of 10,000 investment over the years.
Date Value 31 Jul 20 ₹10,000 31 Jul 21 ₹17,294 31 Jul 22 ₹18,767 31 Jul 23 ₹25,348 31 Jul 24 ₹38,470 31 Jul 25 ₹39,107
SBI Magnum Mid Cap Fund
Growth
Fund Details Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 5.78% Equity 94.1% Debt 0.13% Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Financial Services 22.88% Consumer Cyclical 17.16% Health Care 12.18% Industrials 11.49% Basic Materials 11.19% Technology 4.74% Real Estate 4.2% Consumer Defensive 4.06% Utility 2.96% Communication Services 1.81% Energy 1.41% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity CRISIL Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 30 Apr 21 | CRISIL4% ₹968 Cr 1,600,000 Sundaram Finance Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 22 | SUNDARMFIN3% ₹771 Cr 1,490,000 HDFC Bank Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Aug 21 | HDFCBANK3% ₹701 Cr 3,500,201
↑ 1,400,200 Shree Cement Ltd (Basic Materials)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 24 | 5003873% ₹698 Cr 225,000 Torrent Power Ltd (Utilities)
Equity, Since 30 Jun 19 | 5327793% ₹690 Cr 4,700,000 Tata Elxsi Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 24 | TATAELXSI3% ₹663 Cr 1,050,000 Schaeffler India Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 28 Feb 14 | SCHAEFFLER3% ₹648 Cr 1,600,000 Max Healthcare Institute Ltd Ordinary Shares (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 21 | MAXHEALTH3% ₹620 Cr 4,862,250
↓ -637,750 Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Jan 15 | M&MFIN3% ₹607 Cr 22,500,000
↑ 2,500,000 Bharat Forge Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 20 | 5004933% ₹589 Cr 4,500,000 HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunities Fund
Growth
Fund Details Asset Allocation
Asset Class Value Cash 7.15% Equity 92.85% Equity Sector Allocation
Sector Value Financial Services 25.63% Consumer Cyclical 17.44% Technology 11.08% Health Care 10.43% Industrials 9.8% Basic Materials 7.04% Consumer Defensive 4.33% Energy 2.89% Communication Services 2.88% Utility 1.31% Top Securities Holdings / Portfolio
Name Holding Value Quantity Max Financial Services Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 14 | 5002715% ₹4,223 Cr 25,638,767
↑ 100,000 Coforge Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 30 Jun 22 | COFORGE3% ₹2,891 Cr 15,020,600 The Federal Bank Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 09 | FEDERALBNK3% ₹2,724 Cr 127,825,000 AU Small Finance Bank Ltd (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 23 | 5406113% ₹2,500 Cr 30,581,550
↑ 1,102,177 Hindustan Petroleum Corp Ltd (Energy)
Equity, Since 30 Sep 21 | HINDPETRO3% ₹2,433 Cr 55,530,830 Indian Bank (Financial Services)
Equity, Since 31 Oct 11 | 5328143% ₹2,371 Cr 36,854,482 Ipca Laboratories Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 31 Jul 07 | 5244943% ₹2,350 Cr 16,909,872
↑ 618,053 Balkrishna Industries Ltd (Consumer Cyclical)
Equity, Since 31 Mar 12 | BALKRISIND3% ₹2,321 Cr 9,490,727
↑ 24,605 Fortis Healthcare Ltd (Healthcare)
Equity, Since 30 Nov 23 | 5328432% ₹2,024 Cr 25,477,319 Persistent Systems Ltd (Technology)
Equity, Since 31 Dec 12 | PERSISTENT2% ₹2,017 Cr 3,337,818
Therefore, from the above pointers, it can be said that both the schemes differ due to various parameters. Therefore, individuals should be cautious while choosing the schemes by checking whether it matches their investment objective or not. They should also understand the modalities of the scheme completely. This will help individuals to attain their objectives completely in a hassle-free manner.